Steady-State Linear Response Matrices of the Lorenz-63 Model and a Two-Layer QG Model
ID:494 View Protection:ATTENDEE Updated Time:2024-10-12 11:07:18 Hits:819 Oral Presentation

Start Time:2025-01-17 14:45(Asia/Shanghai)

Duration:15min

Session:S35 Session 35-Eddy Variability in the Ocean and Atmosphere: Dynamics, Parameterization and Prediction » S35-2Eddy Variability in the Ocean and Atmosphere: Dynamics, Parameterization and Prediction

No files

Abstract
The climate system is a nonlinear chaotic system.  A steady-state linear response matrix (L) denotes the time-mean responses (x) of the system to weak time-invariant forcings (f), as x=Lf.  Such matrix L can be used to (1) tell the time-mean response given a time-invariant forcing, (2) force a specified mean state for hypothesis testing, (3) tell the most excitable mode (left singular vector of L with the largest singular value), and (4) tell the exponentially/spirally decaying eigenmodes of the system (eigenvectors of -L-1), if the system can be approximated as linear Markov process.  Here, we discuss the steady-state linear response matrices of the Lorenz-63 model and a two-layer quasi-geostrophic (QG) model.
Counter-intuitively, direct computation (applying weak time-invariant forcings) shows that the steady-state linear response matrix of the Lorenz-63 model has a negative eigenvalue.  Specifically, a weak time-invariant forcing in z direction will give a steady-state response in the exact opposite direction.  This marks the failure of the linear Markov assumption.  While negative eigenvalue was also found in a convective system (Kuang 2024, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-23-0194.1), negative eigenvalue is more counter-intuitive for Lorenz-63 model as the model is not simplified (e.g., by horizonal average).
Methods to compute steady-state linear response matrix (for example, fluctuation-dissipation theorem, FDT) are sometimes inaccurate.  The reason behind the inaccuracy, especially the role of chaos, remains unclear.  Here, we propose to use two simple nonlinear chaotic models, the Lorenz-63 model and a two-layer quasi-geostrophic (QG) model, as unified testbeds to study the accuracy of those linearization methods.  We compute the steady-state linear response matrix by FDT, and test its accuracy against the directly computed matrix.  Finally, we will briefly introduce progress in computing the steady-state linear response matrix in the Lorenz-63 model and a two-layer QG model by sinusoidal forcings.  We hope that linearization methods, evaluated and/or improved in these testbeds, can be used for fast and accurate linearizations of more realistic atmospheric systems.
Keywords
Lorenz-63 model,steady-state linear response matrix,chaos
Speaker
Pak Wah Chan
Associate Professor Fudan University

Submission Author
Pak Wah Chan Fudan University
Yutian Hou Fudan University
Xingfeng Li Fudan University
Junwei Chen Fudan University
Submit Comment
Verify Code Change Another
All Comments
Important Date
  • Conference Date

    Jan 13

    2025

    to

    Jan 17

    2025

  • Sep 27 2024

    Draft paper submission deadline

  • Feb 17 2025

    Registration deadline

Sponsored By
State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University
Organized By
State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University
Department of Earth Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Contact Information